Was recommended to listen to these songs. They're pretty entertaining..
Monday, April 6, 2009
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Day 46
On my 1-month check-up, i was told tat my shortsightedness is gone on my right eye, while some degree came back on the left. I know - fluctuating. Astig is 0.75 on both eyes. Funny, cos i dun feel like i could read like wat I'm supposed to with a near perfect eyesight now. However, I was told tat it is good to hav some astigmatism left as u age. Hmm....
Red patches r almost gone. Dunno why mine takes so long, tho. Other than tat, it has been a bliss. I dun hav to squint my eyes in d morning to go in n out of d bathroom in d morning, no hassle of putting in n taking off d contact lenses, no dry n discomfort due to long wear of contact lenses, n no more hassle of wearing the glasses! A burden tat i hav to carry for 18 years.
It has been wonderful so far.
Red patches r almost gone. Dunno why mine takes so long, tho. Other than tat, it has been a bliss. I dun hav to squint my eyes in d morning to go in n out of d bathroom in d morning, no hassle of putting in n taking off d contact lenses, no dry n discomfort due to long wear of contact lenses, n no more hassle of wearing the glasses! A burden tat i hav to carry for 18 years.
It has been wonderful so far.
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Day 21
There's still some obvious red patches left in my left eye. I m still using the SunVisors for outdoors. Hehehe...look like one of the stars in the Matrix movies. Did i mention abt the eye protectors? They r actually 2 pieces of cave-in plastic materials in a shape of a teardrop. With 9 5mm holes in the centre. If they r avail in black/green color, they'll make u look like "lalat man".
Other than the red patches, my eyesight is still fluctuating. It could last up to 3, 6 or even 12 mths, depending on individuals. My glares n starbursts r more worse. My astig is still so there.
On my 1d check-up (means the day after the treatment day - in 24hrs), my eye power dropped to 25. Then on my 1week check, my right eye was 75 with 0 at the left, but my astig was 1.25 for both eyes.
Time to rest my eyes, again.
Other than the red patches, my eyesight is still fluctuating. It could last up to 3, 6 or even 12 mths, depending on individuals. My glares n starbursts r more worse. My astig is still so there.
On my 1d check-up (means the day after the treatment day - in 24hrs), my eye power dropped to 25. Then on my 1week check, my right eye was 75 with 0 at the left, but my astig was 1.25 for both eyes.
Time to rest my eyes, again.
The Big Day
Day 13 (Feb, Friday the 13th)
Today is the day tat I braved thru my fear, stormed thru my doubts, built up my hidden courage, n did lasik. A whole life of waiting (actually since 1996 when i got to know n told myself then tat "one day, i'm gonna do tis") n 1 week of thorough research. But I only spent a mere 10mins in the "treatment" room.
Recovery will be long for me as I had very high power of shortsightedness (8.25 each eye, tho I could hav sworn tat it used to be more than tat for my right eye) as well as astigmatism (1.25 n 1.75). I’ve got high HOA, glares, starbursts n halo even before treatment due to my pupils. Luckily cornea wise, pressure n dryness factors were all alright for me to undergo the whole thing.
It all started with a preliminary test, which is not charged. This test could be done after a few days of laying off ur soft contact lenses. But for more accuracy, it is advised to lay them off for a longer period (it must be abt 14days before the treatment day). This prelim test is js to check whether u r qualified or not for lasik treatment. Should u not, they’d probably suggest ICL to u. And if u r qualified, the consultants will advise u which type of treatment that is suitable for u. During tis visit, they will check ur power (the usual machine with the lil red barn in the middle of a green hilly pasture. I forgot whether did we proceed to the machine with the lenses swapping in front of ur eyes to see the alphabets way up front). Next, they check ur eye pressure (with some wind blown into each eyes), the thickness of ur pupils (light hand-carried black-coloured tool) (pupil size of 8mm or 9mm r generally considered thick, n pose a higher risk of halo, glares, starburst n ghosting effect.), n whether ur eyes r too dry (by sticking a piece of special paper right on ur eyeballs til tears stroll down). Now the last test was only done on me at 1 of the 2 centres tat I surveyed.
For more in-depth checking, u need to make another visit. This time it is a paid visit, abt RM120 to RM150. This time they check my higher order aberration, with coloured 3D images of my eyes, my glares, starbursts etc condition, n again on the eye pressure, eye power. I m only referring to intralasik procedures as I opted for tat. Also becos of tat, I think tis hole in my pocket will not heal even after my flap heals…. But seriously, mind u, whatever youtube tells u abt the flap never heals, it’s true. They will forever be there. But in saying tat, it takes a special tool to lift the flaps up. U cannot lift them up easily. After the treatment, the flaps will close up by the next day, it will continue to heal in abt 4 to 5 years’ time. By then, they r well enough n by 8 years, they would be well bonded.
On the big day, make sure u dun put on any product with alcohol, no make-up n hav eaten a meal. I emphasize on the meal part becos u go straight to bed after the treatment. U need somebody to drive u back becos it is advs tat u keep ur eyes closed n rested after the procedure. They will do some eye examinations again to ensure everything is in order, then a solution to numb ur eyes r applied b4 some dot markings r done with a marker for the actual treatment. Once u hav made the payment n the numbness wears off, u will then be led into the treatment room where u'd be prepared for surgery.
Note tat the only pain tat I felt was js a sting when they put the ring n suction thing before cutting the flaps (which was done by laser, creating tiny gas bubbles b4 they combine, which result in the cut flaps). Think tis is to lock the eye in position so the femtosecond laser could be applied. The whole while u'd be looking (focusing) at the middle point of a ring of lights. Next, u need to stand up n walk to the nearby excimer laser machine where the flaps r lifted n the laser correction treatment is done. Flaps r placed back, u blink a few times to ensure they're not crumpled n u're free to go.
For me, my right eye felt teary like when u peel onions, except tat it’s milder than the actual onion peeling. I also felt like a piece of foreign object in my eye. My left eye felt better but it wasn’t a good sign. It means tat it was a bit dry. We’ll hav to c how it goes with recuperation. For the first 48 hours, u need to sleep, rest n nap. I tot tis would be easy as I finally hav a reason to laze for 2 days. But it turned out to be a nightmare. I took the whole week off. The days tat I could nap for 1 or 2 hours in the daytime I couldn’t sleep at nite til 3am++, while the days I couldn’t nap n ended up with anxiety I could sleep well at night. Medication wise is of utmost importance. I’ve heard of complications due to not following the prescription time given. There r the artificial tears, the anti-inflammatory n antibiotic drops, all to be put in stipulated time. The aftifial tears being the most frequent, initially abt once in half an hour, then once every hour n later on once every 2 hours.
There r a few options tat I’ve mentioned earlier. In short, epi-lasik n lasek r both suface treatment. Only the epitheliem layer is cut like only abt 50 microns with the stroma layer uncut. The down side is tat it is more painful, slow recuperation n risk of haze. Lasek is with alcohol, to loosen the epithelium layer, while epi is without. On the other hand, lasik n intralasik r more invasive procedures. A flap of 100micron is created, which goes into the stroma part. This heals faster, lesser pain, but the risks r dry eyes (as it cuts thru the stroma layer where there r nerves involved), eyesight quality ie halos, glares, starburst n ghosting (double) image, n flap complications. Note tat people who has thin cornea, eventho it depends on ur eye power, generally is considered thin if it’s btw 300 to 400 micron). We do not consider PRK anymore as it is not carried out anymore. Intralasik/intralase/z-lasik is lasik with flap cut by laser as well, as opposed to the old method of cutting it by using a microkerotome, which is with actual blade. Tis eliminates risks due to blade. Wavwfront/customised intralasik is the latest technology whereby a 3D mapping of ur eye is done so tat a precise flap is cut n everything is tailor-made. This is becos our eyes r like thumbprints. They r unique n so this treatment is the most precise.
Now let’s talk abt eye laser shopping. There r 2 prominent centres here in kl. I did not even dare to step into another centre, which is smaller in scale, due to the incident reported…can google it up. Plenty of stories. Now let’s call them A n B. A offers ONLY lasik treatment, while B offers all but they would still advs u to do lasik. I would think tat it is becos they r more used to doing lasik. However, I do get different implications upon doing my studies… Anyway, B did not recommend me to do the custom one as my corneas r too thin for them. By then, I hav got to know my eys with so much details tat I hope to do customwave. Upon checking (note that u MUST compare the technologies thay hav in each centres as tis is the crucial factor), eventho B hav machine 1, which A hav as well, they do not machine 2. This is the crucial part: machine 2 does not only safe corneas tissue by 20 to 30%, it also is approved for NASA use. Astronauts use tis machine as well. Naturally, the price is 2x. Upon checking with B also, they told me tat they will shoot me with machine 3, which from wat I read in the comparison website, is not tat recommended. They hav machine 2,3,4 n 5…but they dun hav machine 2. If only they hav, I m sure the price will not be as steep… Another thing to ponder is tat I could see my surgeon on the second visit already for A (where u could direct ur concerns), while was told tat i only c my surgeon on the actual day for B. And so, I went for A with the 2x price tag. Oh, A gives out tis kit tat comes with the eye protectors n a pair of sunglasses - saves u d trouble. However, B does hav more branches n there's 1 avail in my hometown, which I'd be flying back to tmrw.
Today is the day tat I braved thru my fear, stormed thru my doubts, built up my hidden courage, n did lasik. A whole life of waiting (actually since 1996 when i got to know n told myself then tat "one day, i'm gonna do tis") n 1 week of thorough research. But I only spent a mere 10mins in the "treatment" room.
Recovery will be long for me as I had very high power of shortsightedness (8.25 each eye, tho I could hav sworn tat it used to be more than tat for my right eye) as well as astigmatism (1.25 n 1.75). I’ve got high HOA, glares, starbursts n halo even before treatment due to my pupils. Luckily cornea wise, pressure n dryness factors were all alright for me to undergo the whole thing.
It all started with a preliminary test, which is not charged. This test could be done after a few days of laying off ur soft contact lenses. But for more accuracy, it is advised to lay them off for a longer period (it must be abt 14days before the treatment day). This prelim test is js to check whether u r qualified or not for lasik treatment. Should u not, they’d probably suggest ICL to u. And if u r qualified, the consultants will advise u which type of treatment that is suitable for u. During tis visit, they will check ur power (the usual machine with the lil red barn in the middle of a green hilly pasture. I forgot whether did we proceed to the machine with the lenses swapping in front of ur eyes to see the alphabets way up front). Next, they check ur eye pressure (with some wind blown into each eyes), the thickness of ur pupils (light hand-carried black-coloured tool) (pupil size of 8mm or 9mm r generally considered thick, n pose a higher risk of halo, glares, starburst n ghosting effect.), n whether ur eyes r too dry (by sticking a piece of special paper right on ur eyeballs til tears stroll down). Now the last test was only done on me at 1 of the 2 centres tat I surveyed.
For more in-depth checking, u need to make another visit. This time it is a paid visit, abt RM120 to RM150. This time they check my higher order aberration, with coloured 3D images of my eyes, my glares, starbursts etc condition, n again on the eye pressure, eye power. I m only referring to intralasik procedures as I opted for tat. Also becos of tat, I think tis hole in my pocket will not heal even after my flap heals…. But seriously, mind u, whatever youtube tells u abt the flap never heals, it’s true. They will forever be there. But in saying tat, it takes a special tool to lift the flaps up. U cannot lift them up easily. After the treatment, the flaps will close up by the next day, it will continue to heal in abt 4 to 5 years’ time. By then, they r well enough n by 8 years, they would be well bonded.
On the big day, make sure u dun put on any product with alcohol, no make-up n hav eaten a meal. I emphasize on the meal part becos u go straight to bed after the treatment. U need somebody to drive u back becos it is advs tat u keep ur eyes closed n rested after the procedure. They will do some eye examinations again to ensure everything is in order, then a solution to numb ur eyes r applied b4 some dot markings r done with a marker for the actual treatment. Once u hav made the payment n the numbness wears off, u will then be led into the treatment room where u'd be prepared for surgery.
Note tat the only pain tat I felt was js a sting when they put the ring n suction thing before cutting the flaps (which was done by laser, creating tiny gas bubbles b4 they combine, which result in the cut flaps). Think tis is to lock the eye in position so the femtosecond laser could be applied. The whole while u'd be looking (focusing) at the middle point of a ring of lights. Next, u need to stand up n walk to the nearby excimer laser machine where the flaps r lifted n the laser correction treatment is done. Flaps r placed back, u blink a few times to ensure they're not crumpled n u're free to go.
For me, my right eye felt teary like when u peel onions, except tat it’s milder than the actual onion peeling. I also felt like a piece of foreign object in my eye. My left eye felt better but it wasn’t a good sign. It means tat it was a bit dry. We’ll hav to c how it goes with recuperation. For the first 48 hours, u need to sleep, rest n nap. I tot tis would be easy as I finally hav a reason to laze for 2 days. But it turned out to be a nightmare. I took the whole week off. The days tat I could nap for 1 or 2 hours in the daytime I couldn’t sleep at nite til 3am++, while the days I couldn’t nap n ended up with anxiety I could sleep well at night. Medication wise is of utmost importance. I’ve heard of complications due to not following the prescription time given. There r the artificial tears, the anti-inflammatory n antibiotic drops, all to be put in stipulated time. The aftifial tears being the most frequent, initially abt once in half an hour, then once every hour n later on once every 2 hours.
There r a few options tat I’ve mentioned earlier. In short, epi-lasik n lasek r both suface treatment. Only the epitheliem layer is cut like only abt 50 microns with the stroma layer uncut. The down side is tat it is more painful, slow recuperation n risk of haze. Lasek is with alcohol, to loosen the epithelium layer, while epi is without. On the other hand, lasik n intralasik r more invasive procedures. A flap of 100micron is created, which goes into the stroma part. This heals faster, lesser pain, but the risks r dry eyes (as it cuts thru the stroma layer where there r nerves involved), eyesight quality ie halos, glares, starburst n ghosting (double) image, n flap complications. Note tat people who has thin cornea, eventho it depends on ur eye power, generally is considered thin if it’s btw 300 to 400 micron). We do not consider PRK anymore as it is not carried out anymore. Intralasik/intralase/z-lasik is lasik with flap cut by laser as well, as opposed to the old method of cutting it by using a microkerotome, which is with actual blade. Tis eliminates risks due to blade. Wavwfront/customised intralasik is the latest technology whereby a 3D mapping of ur eye is done so tat a precise flap is cut n everything is tailor-made. This is becos our eyes r like thumbprints. They r unique n so this treatment is the most precise.
Now let’s talk abt eye laser shopping. There r 2 prominent centres here in kl. I did not even dare to step into another centre, which is smaller in scale, due to the incident reported…can google it up. Plenty of stories. Now let’s call them A n B. A offers ONLY lasik treatment, while B offers all but they would still advs u to do lasik. I would think tat it is becos they r more used to doing lasik. However, I do get different implications upon doing my studies… Anyway, B did not recommend me to do the custom one as my corneas r too thin for them. By then, I hav got to know my eys with so much details tat I hope to do customwave. Upon checking (note that u MUST compare the technologies thay hav in each centres as tis is the crucial factor), eventho B hav machine 1, which A hav as well, they do not machine 2. This is the crucial part: machine 2 does not only safe corneas tissue by 20 to 30%, it also is approved for NASA use. Astronauts use tis machine as well. Naturally, the price is 2x. Upon checking with B also, they told me tat they will shoot me with machine 3, which from wat I read in the comparison website, is not tat recommended. They hav machine 2,3,4 n 5…but they dun hav machine 2. If only they hav, I m sure the price will not be as steep… Another thing to ponder is tat I could see my surgeon on the second visit already for A (where u could direct ur concerns), while was told tat i only c my surgeon on the actual day for B. And so, I went for A with the 2x price tag. Oh, A gives out tis kit tat comes with the eye protectors n a pair of sunglasses - saves u d trouble. However, B does hav more branches n there's 1 avail in my hometown, which I'd be flying back to tmrw.
Monday, February 2, 2009
Point of view
Poor Florence was driven up the wall. A wise man came to the rescue n she was spare from the wall n from strangling her own self. The end.
Sunday, February 1, 2009
Day 1
Day 1 of a long mth off, besides burning a massive hole in my pocket, certainly is a GREAT day to begin with ;-P
I woke up at 11.30am, took things slowly, then went for cny visits, took things slowly, n still had time to bake a cake, smtg tat i hadn't done in a long while.
The humble butter cake. Of course, I changed the recipe slightly....added abt 30gm more butter....thum-ti-thum.....sort of made it more moist, but it is the heavenly butter we're talking abt here - u can't blame butter for any crime at all. Really.
Came up with another new year resolution. I've so got to get meself a good oven - one tat cooks evenly....
I woke up at 11.30am, took things slowly, then went for cny visits, took things slowly, n still had time to bake a cake, smtg tat i hadn't done in a long while.
The humble butter cake. Of course, I changed the recipe slightly....added abt 30gm more butter....thum-ti-thum.....sort of made it more moist, but it is the heavenly butter we're talking abt here - u can't blame butter for any crime at all. Really.
Came up with another new year resolution. I've so got to get meself a good oven - one tat cooks evenly....
Saturday, January 10, 2009
Just 5 days
"French minister Rachida Dati back to work just five days after a caesarean".
Even if it's possible, I dun agree with this. There r a lot of studies, Chinese ones, indicating tat a strict 45 days is darn needed for a full recovery from a delivery. Most women do not heed the advise n only do a 30 days maternity - still acceptable.... But in tis case we r talking abt a c-section. We r talking abt the belly being butchered in order to deliver a baby. Heck, tat woman should be resting.
As powerfull as the mind n spirit r, probably a strong n darn healthy body condition as well, I still dun think it's wise to do js an 11.11% of the full maternity period.
Even if it's possible, I dun agree with this. There r a lot of studies, Chinese ones, indicating tat a strict 45 days is darn needed for a full recovery from a delivery. Most women do not heed the advise n only do a 30 days maternity - still acceptable.... But in tis case we r talking abt a c-section. We r talking abt the belly being butchered in order to deliver a baby. Heck, tat woman should be resting.
As powerfull as the mind n spirit r, probably a strong n darn healthy body condition as well, I still dun think it's wise to do js an 11.11% of the full maternity period.
Saturday, December 20, 2008
Bah Humbug!
The egg yolk is too pale in colour, the queue is js always too long, n the sky is not blue enough...etc...I've got so many whims n discontents lately - I mean, more than usual. Tat it doesn't seem quite like Christmas.
It's js me. I need a Christmas cheer. Un-Scrooge me!
And I can't find the perfect Christmas songs list #$%^&!
It's js me. I need a Christmas cheer. Un-Scrooge me!
And I can't find the perfect Christmas songs list #$%^&!
Friday, December 5, 2008
Lai Meng of Msia
We used to watch her in those local chinese dramas, usually as the fierce mother or MIL. Then we thought she had retired. But no. At the full age of 81, she is like the belakang parang diasah lagikan tajam. The Sg production "Money No Enough 2" starred our very own Lai Meng. She rocks. I luv her expressions, it had went from sad, to miserable, to depressing n finally to heartbreaking, despite the random shootings u'd hav in the filming. She is so good tat she sent me wailing like a baby. I had to paused the show quite a while to wipe all the tears welled up by my glasses.
Keep up the good work!
Keep up the good work!
Sunday, October 19, 2008
The Firm Season 2
Team Dian. With Ridzuan, Masami n Chris, tis team was ready to work for Dian n win. Masami, despite being quiet, was giving herself too. Chris was great. Of course tis being his "comfort zone", he would naturally be at his best. But he din hav to, n yet he did. I love Ridzuan! He's such a nice, helpful n committed person. Din c it b4. Overall, Team Dian was a team working together. Guess the only obvious hiccup was the missunderstanding with all the celebrities in the first point of communication. The celebrities were doing them a favour n they really weren't obliged to anything. They js want to c sincerity, good event planning n generally be comfortable w the whole situation (or for some, things tat could benefit them ie materialistically or mere publicity).
Team Ain. People in Team Ain generally giv questions i/o answers. The guys were there to sabo i/o giving their "bestest". Eventho Jenn din go the extra miles (which she really din hav to anymore) at least she had the heart not to create headaches to Ain. JL was as usual could not be seen. But YW was js too much! Yeah he was trying to flaunt his capabilities during his days of his own battle, but now tat he's supposed to be helping Ain... Frankly speaking, if Rumah Hope could only agree with giving 8 kids out for the event day, then it is not a "question" nor a problem, rite? U js accept it, deal with it n plan from there. The part abt telling ppl to breath in etc was so uncalled for. KY should giv her a break too. The thing abt letterhead, u should go n find all the facts first b4 posing a decisive question to the boss. Tat way even if she still thinks it's a measly problem n tat u could deal with it at ur end, at least u coud already decide liao with all the facts/options in hand. Calling like tat was as tho u dun want to handle it n nak cuci tangan je.
N the brand sen. assoc. person for Adeedas really had issues. Since ur company is offering to giv back to society, u should be telling wat u're ready to offer, i/o shooting ppl in broad daylite. The way she talked was as tho ppl owe her big time. Did ppl came begging her for doing charity? Ur company is providing sponsorship so the thing u could do is BE NICE, n not tarnish the image of ur company.
Despite all the obstacles, it was good tat good things happened too. Ain was good in providing entertainment n so ppl were very happy. N she knows tat when ppl r happy, they will put in more effort for her. Plus, the free transportation service tat she'd gotten.
Team Ain. People in Team Ain generally giv questions i/o answers. The guys were there to sabo i/o giving their "bestest". Eventho Jenn din go the extra miles (which she really din hav to anymore) at least she had the heart not to create headaches to Ain. JL was as usual could not be seen. But YW was js too much! Yeah he was trying to flaunt his capabilities during his days of his own battle, but now tat he's supposed to be helping Ain... Frankly speaking, if Rumah Hope could only agree with giving 8 kids out for the event day, then it is not a "question" nor a problem, rite? U js accept it, deal with it n plan from there. The part abt telling ppl to breath in etc was so uncalled for. KY should giv her a break too. The thing abt letterhead, u should go n find all the facts first b4 posing a decisive question to the boss. Tat way even if she still thinks it's a measly problem n tat u could deal with it at ur end, at least u coud already decide liao with all the facts/options in hand. Calling like tat was as tho u dun want to handle it n nak cuci tangan je.
N the brand sen. assoc. person for Adeedas really had issues. Since ur company is offering to giv back to society, u should be telling wat u're ready to offer, i/o shooting ppl in broad daylite. The way she talked was as tho ppl owe her big time. Did ppl came begging her for doing charity? Ur company is providing sponsorship so the thing u could do is BE NICE, n not tarnish the image of ur company.
Despite all the obstacles, it was good tat good things happened too. Ain was good in providing entertainment n so ppl were very happy. N she knows tat when ppl r happy, they will put in more effort for her. Plus, the free transportation service tat she'd gotten.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
The Firm Season 2
It was abt creating awareness n Jennifer's idea was exactly wat was needed in the task screened 4th oct. Chris was uncalled for for being, as usual, going his own pace, n also i/o providing support he complaints, eg abt the attention given for handling the media. It was not intended to be a fun fair in the first place. Moreover, a team player do not js walk off n "lepak" out of the venue n "berpeluk tubuh" no matter how disagreeable u r with the whole thing. But then again we all know he was bound to do smtg like tat. Do u ever c Boon Yew doing such a thing??
It was either Kian You or Chris. I guess egoistic plus promising non-feasible things plus not being able to "bring smtg to the table", as Ain put it, were the reasons for KY's elimination. Cjris was safe again.
Last week saw a shocking turn. Instead of 1, 2 were ousted.
We all know Jennifer had been damn focused all the while. She comes up with logic, feasible n bright ideas (her ideas will not create any ??? hovering over anybody's head), she knows wat to prioritise, how to plan, she could work, she could deliver - basically she tops them all. But the question is, why is she eliminated?
Jennifer brought the team to success whether as a team player or as the leader. She had not once put herself in any difficult situation nor did she once created any reasons to be ever doubted. Then there it comes. The ONE time tat her idea failed her (the objective was to generate as much income for 1 particular day, regardless of being creative or not, as long as the $$$ earned is the highest) was in tis task. If she is not sacked becos of tis, when will be the best time to sack her, as there is a high possibility tat there'll be no more instances like tis one.
Could it be due to the quota reason? Joel won The Firm in season 1, so it had to be someone from the different race. Tis is a strong reason to explain why Ain was invited back as the quantity need to be more. Another point to ponder would be tat Jennifer was very vocal n defensive while not humble at all when talking to Tengku (should hav at least admitted ur wrongs upfront to ur future boss, rite? I mean think of it tis way: if u're hiring, wouldn't u want to hire some1 who is humble enough to admit her fault when u tell her straight in the face?)
And we all doubt Chris times n times again. Itupun he had been given sooooo many chances to change his style n prove us tat he could be mature. One thing abt Chris is tat he does not argue back in the boardroom so none of the corporate leaders nor Tengku had any personal dislike towards him. Chris is not dumb. He is very fast in thinking n draws up conclusions instantly. But he is js not The One. And we all need ppl like tis, n a very subtle n play safe type like Dian to be in the finals. And when The Strong one is ousted, it is easier to fire the regular ones. I dunno, but i expect Ain to win now...?
Hmmm....Ain could be defensive at times n she does role her eyes in the boardroom a lot. She also throws her hand everywhere when explaining smtg. It does not reflect profesionalism. Dian, on the other hand, handles things very calmly n she does not over-defend herself until the extent of hardselling herself (think YW n KY). Both r the type who thinks in the box n not anticipative, but one comes too strong while the other is very subtle whom is manageable. And when u look at the past season, Tengku likes some1 tat he could control so in saying tat, Dian stands a chance to win too.
So there it is. The 2 dalils why Jennifer could not win, as much as how ritefully n rationally it is. Guess tis is the real world. All's fair in love n war.
It was either Kian You or Chris. I guess egoistic plus promising non-feasible things plus not being able to "bring smtg to the table", as Ain put it, were the reasons for KY's elimination. Cjris was safe again.
Last week saw a shocking turn. Instead of 1, 2 were ousted.
We all know Jennifer had been damn focused all the while. She comes up with logic, feasible n bright ideas (her ideas will not create any ??? hovering over anybody's head), she knows wat to prioritise, how to plan, she could work, she could deliver - basically she tops them all. But the question is, why is she eliminated?
Jennifer brought the team to success whether as a team player or as the leader. She had not once put herself in any difficult situation nor did she once created any reasons to be ever doubted. Then there it comes. The ONE time tat her idea failed her (the objective was to generate as much income for 1 particular day, regardless of being creative or not, as long as the $$$ earned is the highest) was in tis task. If she is not sacked becos of tis, when will be the best time to sack her, as there is a high possibility tat there'll be no more instances like tis one.
Could it be due to the quota reason? Joel won The Firm in season 1, so it had to be someone from the different race. Tis is a strong reason to explain why Ain was invited back as the quantity need to be more. Another point to ponder would be tat Jennifer was very vocal n defensive while not humble at all when talking to Tengku (should hav at least admitted ur wrongs upfront to ur future boss, rite? I mean think of it tis way: if u're hiring, wouldn't u want to hire some1 who is humble enough to admit her fault when u tell her straight in the face?)
And we all doubt Chris times n times again. Itupun he had been given sooooo many chances to change his style n prove us tat he could be mature. One thing abt Chris is tat he does not argue back in the boardroom so none of the corporate leaders nor Tengku had any personal dislike towards him. Chris is not dumb. He is very fast in thinking n draws up conclusions instantly. But he is js not The One. And we all need ppl like tis, n a very subtle n play safe type like Dian to be in the finals. And when The Strong one is ousted, it is easier to fire the regular ones. I dunno, but i expect Ain to win now...?
Hmmm....Ain could be defensive at times n she does role her eyes in the boardroom a lot. She also throws her hand everywhere when explaining smtg. It does not reflect profesionalism. Dian, on the other hand, handles things very calmly n she does not over-defend herself until the extent of hardselling herself (think YW n KY). Both r the type who thinks in the box n not anticipative, but one comes too strong while the other is very subtle whom is manageable. And when u look at the past season, Tengku likes some1 tat he could control so in saying tat, Dian stands a chance to win too.
So there it is. The 2 dalils why Jennifer could not win, as much as how ritefully n rationally it is. Guess tis is the real world. All's fair in love n war.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
VKLiew, again!
The Borneo Post today shows a pic of my fav guy VKLiew. Why, I hav no idea he is capable of smilling - let alone grinning WIDELY! Must be 1 of those days tat u wake up js not being urself. In tis case a jerkish sulky rude arrogant b*tch waking up as Uncle Jolly. The NST also printed a pathetic pic of his.
Act of courage n responsibility u say? It is the responsibility of a representative of the people to set a good example to his people. Ponder on tat. Act on tat.
P/S: Looking at the doughnut i/o the hole, Lim GE says it best ;-P
Act of courage n responsibility u say? It is the responsibility of a representative of the people to set a good example to his people. Ponder on tat. Act on tat.
P/S: Looking at the doughnut i/o the hole, Lim GE says it best ;-P
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
The Firm Season 2
Instead of Boon Yew, Masami should hav been ousted. Masami was the team leader n should bear the responsibility. I js could not agree with the way she lead. Instead, she was able to buy more time to stay in the show. I feel boon Yew, as a team player could not be seen rebellious all the time; moreover, he did voice n sell his opinions. Wat else could he do? Beg n cry n get all emotional js to fish for sympathy? Boon Yew is very rational n calm. I believe he will go far.
Dian was too defensive. When a person is selling his idea, naturally he will mention abt the plus points. But in saying tat, tat doesn't mean tat he means YOU r the opposite. Ifeel Dian could be more accomodative n try to hear ppl out i/o dominating a certain idea. She shuts ppl out. Yes, an idea need to be fertilised for it to grow bigger n greater. But at the same time, a team player should not close herself up from others' ideas n prospects.
Hmmm....there is a twist here since Ain has came back. I still believe Jennifer will conquest all. But I foresee a lil bit of competition from Ain..
Dian was too defensive. When a person is selling his idea, naturally he will mention abt the plus points. But in saying tat, tat doesn't mean tat he means YOU r the opposite. Ifeel Dian could be more accomodative n try to hear ppl out i/o dominating a certain idea. She shuts ppl out. Yes, an idea need to be fertilised for it to grow bigger n greater. But at the same time, a team player should not close herself up from others' ideas n prospects.
Hmmm....there is a twist here since Ain has came back. I still believe Jennifer will conquest all. But I foresee a lil bit of competition from Ain..
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Jane Austen
Say wat u must but nothing sucks more than an unhappy ending to a tale of romance. But i do suppose it is an exception with this one for "one could not be a wife and a writer" in those days. Should she had chosen not to be wat she had became, there would be no Becoming Jane...
Becoming Jane
Becoming a woman. Becoming a legend.
Becoming JaneBecoming a woman. Becoming a legend.
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
The Firm Season 2
Again, Jennifer had sailed thru her given task. Come what may, Jennifer is always very clear of the assignment (while others r still deep in the woods n hav yet to see the light eg Yuen Wai), she is very fast in reaction n coming up with alternatives, n she knows how to handle ppl with different characteristics. She has leadership qualities too.
Boon Yew on the other hand, apparently did not prove himself to be creative n "think out of the box". Yes, no doubt he could giv life to presentations n he could talk.
Masami, I feel, shares some similarities with Chris, only tat their physical reaction is very contrast. Both r pessimistic, both like to find faults in ppl n both tend to succumb to their own state of unable-to-acceptfulness. Masami gav a good start but somehow...
Jennifer, kambate!!
Boon Yew on the other hand, apparently did not prove himself to be creative n "think out of the box". Yes, no doubt he could giv life to presentations n he could talk.
Masami, I feel, shares some similarities with Chris, only tat their physical reaction is very contrast. Both r pessimistic, both like to find faults in ppl n both tend to succumb to their own state of unable-to-acceptfulness. Masami gav a good start but somehow...
Jennifer, kambate!!
"This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh.." Gen. 2:23
"Kalau u hormat pada wanita, u takkan buat cam tu", a line quoted from the local production, Frontpage. Eventho it was js referring to some stupid teasing from a street youngster, it really reflect on the values carried by the society. Respect towards women is an issue with the society, with upbringing.
If there is respect towards women, there will not be the jerkish whistling n/or honking hooligans driving by, hidden camera nuisance, harassment, molest, rape, pedophile, domestic violence or any form of disrespect/violence cases inflicted on women /girls.
Sad to say, the punishment for a drug-related crime weigh far more than rape cases. I am not questioning on the drug-related cases, rather, I m emphasizing how mere are violence-towards-women crimes are being regarded. U hav a choice to take drugs (n u hav no one to blame in the world but urself), but do u get to decide whether u want to be subjected to the humiliation, life-traumatizing n/or brutality of rape?
If there is respect towards women, there will not be the jerkish whistling n/or honking hooligans driving by, hidden camera nuisance, harassment, molest, rape, pedophile, domestic violence or any form of disrespect/violence cases inflicted on women /girls.
Sad to say, the punishment for a drug-related crime weigh far more than rape cases. I am not questioning on the drug-related cases, rather, I m emphasizing how mere are violence-towards-women crimes are being regarded. U hav a choice to take drugs (n u hav no one to blame in the world but urself), but do u get to decide whether u want to be subjected to the humiliation, life-traumatizing n/or brutality of rape?
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
The Firm Season 2
Last week in Team Equity the expected finally happened - The Hold-Myself-Fully-Responsible was terminated. In a way, the 3 people who volunteered themselves to be terminated were..."sweet", willing to bear responsibility n considerate. But at the same time in doing tat, it showed how much tat they're not there to be the winner n js did not bother.
I must say it was really exciting over in Team Asset tis week. Ernie could be cocky n blunt, at all times, but he can really analize the situation damn well. He listed all the fault in the 3 of them n weighed all the cons down to Joo Li being the most deserving to be terminated.
It was very clear tat as time goes by, Yuen Wai had stepped-up n became a great team player. But at the same time, Joo Li has became more irresponsible, pushing the blame n non-participating. N Chris pula more n more questioning while not offering any suggestions. It is good to question n challenge ideas during brainstorming sessions but as u do tat u could suggest an alternative or another way of doing things, or if u dun hav any ideas to contribute, u could explain nicely why u think tat a certain idea is not a good one. A great example is Masami in Team Equity. Eventho Dian's sugg suck (big time) for the second time, which was on the theme again, Masami actually complimented her before offering another idea. Masami's idea "Shrimply the best", I feel, was excellent. She also took the time to explain wat's wrong with Dian's idea. It does not take a genius to tell tat "A taste of courage" will be a bad theme for an f&b outlet. Their actual theme in the end was lousy, I guess "somebody", again, must hav been very defensive towards her own bad idea.
Wat's with Kian Yew anyway? He was fighting with The Client! I mean, when a client gives u a 'no', it means NO. No 2 way abt it, man.
N to Chris, the other 2 teammates left in the same boat as u r not going to plot to kick u out, rather u give too many reasons for u to be ousted. KY n YW were not dominating the work n trying to show off themselves, rather they were js being team players. Team players who want their team to win.
Again, Boon Yew, Jennifer n Masami were great. They know their priority n able to handle the actual day well (which in an event, it's wat it'is all abt), contrary to Chris n Joo Li.
At the end of tis race, I do c Jennifer, Boon Yew n Masami. Some minus points, tho, for Masami, as she did not deliver well as the TL in the previous week. She did not act according to the current situation, as the corporate leader had put it. While Jennifer had performed outstandingly as a TL previously, Boon Yew has yet to prove his leadership qualities. After all, this race is all abt finding a leader.
I must say it was really exciting over in Team Asset tis week. Ernie could be cocky n blunt, at all times, but he can really analize the situation damn well. He listed all the fault in the 3 of them n weighed all the cons down to Joo Li being the most deserving to be terminated.
It was very clear tat as time goes by, Yuen Wai had stepped-up n became a great team player. But at the same time, Joo Li has became more irresponsible, pushing the blame n non-participating. N Chris pula more n more questioning while not offering any suggestions. It is good to question n challenge ideas during brainstorming sessions but as u do tat u could suggest an alternative or another way of doing things, or if u dun hav any ideas to contribute, u could explain nicely why u think tat a certain idea is not a good one. A great example is Masami in Team Equity. Eventho Dian's sugg suck (big time) for the second time, which was on the theme again, Masami actually complimented her before offering another idea. Masami's idea "Shrimply the best", I feel, was excellent. She also took the time to explain wat's wrong with Dian's idea. It does not take a genius to tell tat "A taste of courage" will be a bad theme for an f&b outlet. Their actual theme in the end was lousy, I guess "somebody", again, must hav been very defensive towards her own bad idea.
Wat's with Kian Yew anyway? He was fighting with The Client! I mean, when a client gives u a 'no', it means NO. No 2 way abt it, man.
N to Chris, the other 2 teammates left in the same boat as u r not going to plot to kick u out, rather u give too many reasons for u to be ousted. KY n YW were not dominating the work n trying to show off themselves, rather they were js being team players. Team players who want their team to win.
Again, Boon Yew, Jennifer n Masami were great. They know their priority n able to handle the actual day well (which in an event, it's wat it'is all abt), contrary to Chris n Joo Li.
At the end of tis race, I do c Jennifer, Boon Yew n Masami. Some minus points, tho, for Masami, as she did not deliver well as the TL in the previous week. She did not act according to the current situation, as the corporate leader had put it. While Jennifer had performed outstandingly as a TL previously, Boon Yew has yet to prove his leadership qualities. After all, this race is all abt finding a leader.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
The Firm season 2
Alas, Ain is out! It was down to The Sissy n Ain, n since it was earlier agreed upon plus the fact tat Ain was argumentative in the board meeting again, she was finally fired. I had high hopes on Ain cos of her alertness n competitiveness....all dashed now cos of you-know-who.
The Student was another issue. Her experiment on the Spritzer mineral water being poured into a balloon, hence making our skin wrinkle-free. WTF??!! It is simply becos of the water giving volume n bloating the balloon up. Try looking at the ED's long face. He was all smiles upon reaching the plant earlier tat day. Her second mistake is the script for the video ad. Her "all the script is in my head" fooled no-one. No-one. She had no script in her head, js the gist of the scenes. She was the cause of the stress-shooting day n she did not bother to owe up, Ain had to defend her.
I luv Jennifer, Masami n Boon Yew. Keep up the good work!!
The Student was another issue. Her experiment on the Spritzer mineral water being poured into a balloon, hence making our skin wrinkle-free. WTF??!! It is simply becos of the water giving volume n bloating the balloon up. Try looking at the ED's long face. He was all smiles upon reaching the plant earlier tat day. Her second mistake is the script for the video ad. Her "all the script is in my head" fooled no-one. No-one. She had no script in her head, js the gist of the scenes. She was the cause of the stress-shooting day n she did not bother to owe up, Ain had to defend her.
I luv Jennifer, Masami n Boon Yew. Keep up the good work!!
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
The Firm season 2
Team Asset. Watching the first episode I tot The Fitness Consultant was going to be fired, of course after The Banker. He kept on side-tracking n talked so aggressively. Guess he got his alliances, alrite. Ain was right when she said tat The Fitness Consultant's presentation was like going to a war n tat he talked girlishly (not judging any sex orientation here). He was n did. Ain was also right most of the times. It's tru tat she gives her opinions straight, cos they dun reali hav much time to come up with smtg n beating around the bush certainly will not help. One thing, at least she was not harsh (sadly, The Boss does not agree. I suppose he would hav his own reasons. And so, she will not stay long). But The Fitness Consultant was clearly rude, harsh n aggressive. The only mistake done by Ain was tat she was not the presenter. She could hav saved the team.
Ain n Terence were rite when they said tat The Banker should decide by himself wht to leave The Firm or not cos it was his own call. The Banker tot tat he was not compatible enough n so made the decision to leave. Let the man go. Let the man go with dignity. Salasiah made 2 mistakes: 1) Suggesting tat the team should talk n persuade The Banker to stay, like it was a children's game n somebody had cried 2) She agreed to leave for the betterment of the team.
Ain n Terence were the only ones participating actively n effectively. Salasiah n The Legal Assistant were always playing safe by not participating enough. The Sissy always got lost during brainstorming while The Banker is permanently lost in the woods.
The Student is another issue. She actually used the word "disgusting" to describe their client's product. We'll forgive her cos she din know better. But we could not forgive her when she gave some rude facial expressives when told by The Boss! I think she was very immature n she was on national tv. She will not stay.
Azti is well balanced - not too active. Not irritating.
The Legal Assistant said "It's ok tat they (Team Equity) rulez, cos we're going to conquer them!". He rocks.
Team Equity. I luv Jennifer n Masami. Jennifer can really prioritise, organize n manage. I won't be surprised if she wins in the end. Masami evaluates the situation n can reason well. She speaks impeccable English too. The Corporate Trainer is the issue in tis team. He over-rate himself. He volunteered himself to be the presenter n vow to be "fully responsible" if they lose, yet was rejected by his team members, politely. They were trying to save his face for him. If he's wise, he should've shutted-up. He claimed tat his team was judging him n tat he was dissapointed. He forgot tat tis is a matter of choosing the perfect person for the role n not js putting someone on the stage js becos he "thinks" he could present well n tat he is willing to hold himself fully responsible. Moreover, hekept on saying tat presenting is wat he does in his daily profession. Masami had to point out tat tis presentation is not abt giving a motivational talk, it is abt trying to sell ur ideas n selling to ur potential customers. It is definitely not the thing tat he does daily n thank God they did not trust him enough for the responsibility. There is a tie between The Sissy n The Hold-Myself-Fully-Responsible.
Anoop was....Anoop.
Boon Yew was js so lively n good.
We await the next episode. My bet is on The Sissy or The Student.
Ain n Terence were rite when they said tat The Banker should decide by himself wht to leave The Firm or not cos it was his own call. The Banker tot tat he was not compatible enough n so made the decision to leave. Let the man go. Let the man go with dignity. Salasiah made 2 mistakes: 1) Suggesting tat the team should talk n persuade The Banker to stay, like it was a children's game n somebody had cried 2) She agreed to leave for the betterment of the team.
Ain n Terence were the only ones participating actively n effectively. Salasiah n The Legal Assistant were always playing safe by not participating enough. The Sissy always got lost during brainstorming while The Banker is permanently lost in the woods.
The Student is another issue. She actually used the word "disgusting" to describe their client's product. We'll forgive her cos she din know better. But we could not forgive her when she gave some rude facial expressives when told by The Boss! I think she was very immature n she was on national tv. She will not stay.
Azti is well balanced - not too active. Not irritating.
The Legal Assistant said "It's ok tat they (Team Equity) rulez, cos we're going to conquer them!". He rocks.
Team Equity. I luv Jennifer n Masami. Jennifer can really prioritise, organize n manage. I won't be surprised if she wins in the end. Masami evaluates the situation n can reason well. She speaks impeccable English too. The Corporate Trainer is the issue in tis team. He over-rate himself. He volunteered himself to be the presenter n vow to be "fully responsible" if they lose, yet was rejected by his team members, politely. They were trying to save his face for him. If he's wise, he should've shutted-up. He claimed tat his team was judging him n tat he was dissapointed. He forgot tat tis is a matter of choosing the perfect person for the role n not js putting someone on the stage js becos he "thinks" he could present well n tat he is willing to hold himself fully responsible. Moreover, hekept on saying tat presenting is wat he does in his daily profession. Masami had to point out tat tis presentation is not abt giving a motivational talk, it is abt trying to sell ur ideas n selling to ur potential customers. It is definitely not the thing tat he does daily n thank God they did not trust him enough for the responsibility. There is a tie between The Sissy n The Hold-Myself-Fully-Responsible.
Anoop was....Anoop.
Boon Yew was js so lively n good.
We await the next episode. My bet is on The Sissy or The Student.
Thursday, July 31, 2008
VK Liew: To treat people as people
One would hav expected a relatively new public figure like VK Liew to be approachable n generally - a PERSON. Sadly, wat he had portrayed is the opposite of his real self. A man who is proud, ill-mannered n does not worth to be regarded. As a Sabahan myself, I feel ashamed of his appointment. Perhaps he could learn a thing or 2 from Datuk TK Koh, who is even a Penangite, or Dr SL Chua.
Always, there r politicians of our beloved country who unfailingly put us in the limelight by making a fool out of themselves. U know, I believe it is still probably forgivable since these incidences might not be intended. (And sometimes, men do hav those days of the month, surprisingly. Recall the amusingly emotional interview on the riot in kl over cnn. CNN!!) I could still giv them the benefit of the doubt. But to intentionally treat/talk inhumanely in a calm n emotionless situation upfront to another being, it's a baffle.
In his blog, he emphasizes on his passion to serve the people. But he forgot the basic thing here is to firstly, treat people as people.
Tis dude here - no respect for u.
Always, there r politicians of our beloved country who unfailingly put us in the limelight by making a fool out of themselves. U know, I believe it is still probably forgivable since these incidences might not be intended. (And sometimes, men do hav those days of the month, surprisingly. Recall the amusingly emotional interview on the riot in kl over cnn. CNN!!) I could still giv them the benefit of the doubt. But to intentionally treat/talk inhumanely in a calm n emotionless situation upfront to another being, it's a baffle.
In his blog, he emphasizes on his passion to serve the people. But he forgot the basic thing here is to firstly, treat people as people.
Tis dude here - no respect for u.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
